Discussion:
Query re DBA: Thomas Latymer
(too old to reply)
Peter Howarth
2015-08-11 07:49:41 UTC
Permalink
I have unfortunately found - quite by accident - another query in the Dictionary of British Arms, whilst researching the Latimer family and its arms.

Volume Three p 158 under the sub-heading 'Gu cross patonce Or & label Sa semy de lis Or' has

LATYMER, Sire Thomas le. N 711

N is the siglum for the Parliamentary Roll (or Great or Bannerets' Roll) dated 1312-1314. According to Sir Anthony Wagner, CEMRA pp 42-43, the original manuscript is British Museum Cotton, Caligula A. XVIII ff. 3-21b, which has been transcribed and published four times.

I have a photocopy of Sir Nicholas Harris Nicolas's edition, 'A Roll of Arms of the Reign of Edward the Second' (1828). The relevant entry says

Sire Thomas le Latymer, de goules, a une crois patee de or, e un label de azure florette de or.

In other words, Nicolas says the roll has the label blue, DBA says it has it black. [At that period, a cross 'patee' was what we now call a cross patonce.] DBA does not say which edition was used nor who wrote up the index cards.

For what it is worth, there were at least two cousins named Thomas le Latimer and several other examples of the arms with labels semy de lis gold on blue and on black.

I have been in touch with the College of Arms, but they are rather defensive and don't seem interested in keeping a list of amendments.

Peter Howarth
p***@gmail.com
2015-08-11 10:20:31 UTC
Permalink
Just for info.
One of the other editions is:
https://archive.org/stream/genealogist1218selb#page/n437/mode/2up

The former parts of the above are found in:
https://archive.org/details/genealogist1118selb

See also:
http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/cotton/mss/cal1.htm

Satoru Uemura
Peter Howarth
2015-08-11 18:16:01 UTC
Permalink
Very many thanks for those references. It's most useful to have another editor's transcription of the manuscript, and Oswald Barron's is likely to be good. I may prefer to have paper copies of books, but electronic versions don't take up so much space on my bookshelves.

I wonder whether the person writing out the index card skipped a couple of lines. I know only too well how easy that is to do.

Peter Howarth
Tim Powys-Lybbe
2015-08-13 21:39:43 UTC
Permalink
On 11 Aug at 8:49, Peter Howarth <***@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Peter Howarth
I have been in touch with the College of Arms, but they are rather
defensive and don't seem interested in keeping a list of amendments.
The College of Arms is a somewhat commercial operation. The series was
published by the Society of Antiquaries who might be more interested in
this long-term project.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe ***@powys.org
for a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
Peter Howarth
2015-08-14 05:31:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Powys-Lybbe
<snip>
Post by Peter Howarth
I have been in touch with the College of Arms, but they are rather
defensive and don't seem interested in keeping a list of amendments.
The College of Arms is a somewhat commercial operation. The series was
published by the Society of Antiquaries who might be more interested in
this long-term project.
--
for a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
My contact at the College happens to be the principal editor of the Dictionary, so I thought he would know of any list that was being kept.

I had also thought of the Heraldry Society, as a more independent organisation. I'm waiting to hear from them. But the Society of Antiquaries might well have to be the next place to try. Many thanks for the suggestion.

Peter Howarth

Loading...